A trademark opposition is a legal proceeding before the Trade Marks Registry through which a third party can object to the registration of a trademark published in the Trade Marks Journal.
Whether you have discovered a conflicting trademark application and want to oppose its registration, or your own trademark application has been opposed and you need to defend it, timely and well-supported action is essential.
At Lal Ghai & Associates, we assist clients throughout trademark opposition proceedings—from reviewing the grounds of opposition and preparing the pleadings to evidence, hearings and final disposal.
After a trademark application is advertised in the Trade Marks Journal, any person can oppose its registration on legally recognised grounds.
An opposition may be based on grounds such as:
The appropriate grounds depend on the facts, the competing marks, the goods/services involved and the evidence available.
The law permits any person to give notice of opposition to the registration of a trademark.
The opponent may therefore be:
Importantly, the opponent does not necessarily have to be the registered proprietor of a trademark. The legal basis of the opposition and the facts supporting the objection must be properly established.
A trademark can generally be opposed after it has been advertised or re-advertised in the Trade Marks Journal and before it proceeds to registration.
Under Rule 42 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, a notice of opposition is filed in Form TM-O within four months from the date of publication of the relevant Trade Marks Journal in which the application was advertised or re-advertised.
Important
The opposition deadline is critical. Missing the prescribed period can result in the opportunity to oppose that application being lost.
We therefore recommend monitoring the Trade Marks Journal regularly for important brands and competing marks.
The first step is to identify the trademark application that may affect your brand.
We review:
A trademark opposition should not be filed merely because two marks look similar.
The legal and factual basis of the opposition must be assessed.
Depending on the circumstances, the opposition may involve:
Earlier Trademark Rights
The applicant’s mark may conflict with an earlier trademark because of similarity between the marks and the goods/services.
Prior Use
An opponent may rely on prior use of its mark and the goodwill/reputation associated with it.
Likelihood of Confusion
Where the competing marks and goods/services are sufficiently similar, registration may create a likelihood of confusion or association.
Lack of Distinctiveness
A mark that does not possess the required distinctive character may face objection.
Descriptive or Generic Character
Marks that merely describe the nature, quality, intended purpose or other characteristics of the goods/services may face statutory objections, subject to the applicable law and evidence.
Bad Faith
Evidence may support an opposition where the application appears to have been filed in bad faith.
Other Statutory Grounds
Additional grounds may apply depending on the facts and the specific provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
A notice of opposition is filed in Form TM-O before the Trade Marks Registry.
The opposition sets out the relevant facts and legal grounds on which registration is opposed.
The notice should be carefully drafted because the opponent’s subsequent evidence and submissions are generally built around the pleaded case.
The prescribed Government fee is payable for the opposition. The current official e-filing fee for a notice of opposition is ₹2,700 per class, subject to the applicable fee schedule.
Once the Registrar serves the notice of opposition on the trademark applicant, the applicant must file a counter-statement in Form TM-O within two months from receipt of the notice.
The counter-statement should:
Important
Failure to file the counter-statement within the prescribed period can result in the trademark application being deemed abandoned under Section 21(2).
After the counter-statement, the opponent may submit evidence in support of the opposition in accordance with the prescribed procedure.
Evidence may include:
The evidence should establish the opponent’s case rather than merely demonstrate that the marks appear similar.
Under Rule 45, the opponent has two months from service of the counter-statement to file evidence by affidavit or notify the Registry that it intends to rely on the facts stated in the notice of opposition.
The trademark applicant is then given the prescribed opportunity to file evidence supporting its application and defence.
Depending on the case, the applicant may rely on:
The application may be accepted, objected to, or accepted subject to conditions/modifications.
Where applicable, the opponent may file reply evidence in accordance with the prescribed procedure.
At this stage, the parties’ evidence is placed before the Registrar for consideration.
After completion of the pleadings and evidence stages, the matter may proceed to hearing.
The parties may present oral submissions addressing:
The Registrar then decides the opposition in accordance with the Trade Marks Act, Rules and evidence on record.
After considering the pleadings, evidence and submissions, the Registrar may:
The outcome depends on the facts and evidence of the individual case.
A trademark opposition may commonly involve:
Where the applied-for trademark is identical or deceptively similar to an earlier trademark and is likely to cause confusion or association.
Where the opponent can establish earlier and substantial use of the mark and the goodwill associated with it.
Where the facts support a claim based on an earlier mark, goodwill and likelihood of misrepresentation/damage, particularly where statutory infringement provisions may not directly apply.
Where the applied-for mark merely describes characteristics of the relevant goods/services and lacks the necessary distinctiveness, subject to the statutory exceptions.
Where the mark is incapable of distinguishing the applicant's goods/services.
Where circumstances indicate that the application was made without a bona fide intention or for an improper purpose.
Where use or registration of the mark may deceive or confuse consumers.
Where the mark falls within other statutory prohibitions under the Trade Marks Act.
Receiving a trademark opposition does not automatically mean that your trademark cannot be registered.
A properly prepared defence can address the allegations and establish why the mark should proceed to registration.
Our defence strategy may include:
The evidence required depends on the facts of the case.
Common documents may include:
For a prior-use claim, evidence should be carefully organised chronologically to establish the date, continuity and extent of use.
An objection is generally raised by the Trade Marks Registry during examination of the trademark application. The applicant responds to the Examination Report and may be required to attend a hearing.
An opposition is filed by a third party against an application after it has been advertised in the Trade Marks Journal. It is a separate proceeding involving an opponent and the trademark applicant.
Trademark opposition proceedings are governed by prescribed procedural timelines.
A delay in responding to an opposition can have serious consequences. In particular, failure to file the counter-statement within the prescribed period can result in the application being deemed abandoned.
Similarly, an opposition must be filed within the applicable period after Journal publication.
For this reason, businesses should monitor the Trade Marks Journal and their trademark application status regularly.
We assist both opponents and trademark applicants in contested trademark matters, including:
Trademark opposition is not merely a form-filing exercise. The strength of the case often depends on how the pleadings are framed, what evidence is available and how the competing marks and goods/services are legally compared.
Our approach combines:
Yes. Section 21 permits any person to oppose registration, subject to the prescribed procedure and time limit. The opponent must, however, have legally sustainable grounds for the opposition.
Under Rule 42, a notice of opposition in Form TM-O is filed within four months from publication or re-publication of the trademark application in the Trade Marks Journal.
The applicant may be deemed to have abandoned the trademark application under Section 21(2).
The counter-statement is to be filed in Form TM-O within two months from receipt of the notice of opposition.
Yes. Registration of the opponent's own trademark is not an absolute prerequisite to filing an opposition. Depending on the facts, an opponent may rely on prior use, goodwill, passing-off principles and other applicable statutory grounds.
A post-registration challenge is a different proceeding. Depending on the circumstances, rectification/cancellation proceedings or other remedies may be available. A normal opposition under Section 21 is directed against an application before registration.
No. The Registrar decides the opposition after considering the pleadings, evidence and submissions of the parties.
Yes. Parties may explore commercially appropriate settlement or co-existence arrangements, subject to the applicable legal and procedural requirements.
Yes. A trademark applicant can defend the application by filing the prescribed counter-statement and participating in the evidence and hearing stages.
Failure to file the counter-statement within the prescribed period can result in the application being deemed abandoned. Immediate legal review is therefore important when an opposition notice is received.
Whether you have discovered a conflicting trademark or received an opposition against your own application, timely action can make a significant difference.
Whether you have discovered a conflicting trademark or received an opposition against your own application, timely action can make a significant difference.
Lal Ghai & Associates provides end-to-end assistance in trademark opposition matters, from initial legal assessment and drafting to evidence, hearings and resolution strategy.
Whether you want to oppose a conflicting trademark or defend your own application, timely legal action is essential. Lal Ghai & Associates can assess your case, identify the applicable grounds, prepare the required pleadings and represent you through the opposition proceedings.
Email: info@lgassociates.org | Offices in Ludhiana – Mohali – Gurgaon